Would Texas’ New Immigration Law Address the Border Crisis?
Summary from the AllSides News Team
Would Texas’ SB 4 immigration law help alleviate the border crisis or encourage racial profiling?
For Context: The law would grant state judges the power to order deportations. The Biden administration argues the law interferes with federal immigration law, while Texas Republicans argue the law is needed to make up for a purported deficiency in federal immigration enforcement. The law was initially blocked by a federal judge. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court temporarily allowed its enforcement, but an appeals court blocked it hours later.
Anti-Immigrant Cruelty? A writer in The Nation (Left bias) stated that Texas is giving its “morally stunted voters more of what they want: racism.” The writer argued the law would empower cops to arrest individuals suspected of being undocumented, and would lead to racial profiling, stating, “How can they tell if a person is an ‘illegal immigrant’ versus just a brown person walking down the street in Dallas? That’s the fun part (for racists): They can’t.”
Godsend for Biden? Noah Rothman (Right bias) argued the law would be “a godsend for Joe Biden if he can summon the courage to ignore his progressive critics.” Pushing back on fears the bill will lead to racial profiling, Rothman stated, “Texas police officers are still not allowed to engage in illegal discrimination, nor are they authorized to stop suspected illegal immigrants purely on the basis of their immigration status.” Rothman concluded, “Texas is willing to do its part to rescue Biden from the bad judgment of his progressive allies.”
Featured Coverage of this Story
From the Left
Texas’s Latest Act of Anti-Immigrant Cruelty Is Blatantly UnconstitutionalSince March 2021, the government of the state of Texas, led by Governor Greg Abbott, has allocated $10 billion to “Operation Lone Star,” which Abbott calls a “border security” initiative designed to stem the flow of undocumented immigrants into the state. The money has had no discernible effect on immigration, undocumented or otherwise, and has mainly been used in the service of human rights violations, such as turning the Rio Grande into a moat designed to maim people seeking to migrate to this country.
Texas voters, a majority of them...
From the Center
Appeals-Court Judges Question Both Sides on Texas Immigration LawFederal appeals-court judges weighing a new Texas plan to arrest and deport migrants appeared at odds over its legality, and whether it could go into effect as courts test whether it is constitutional for states to set their own immigration policies.
The hearing Wednesday before a three-judge panel was the latest in a volley of legal orders regarding the law, known as SB 4. A U.S. Supreme Court order blocking it from taking effect was allowed to expire earlier this week before it was blocked again, minutes later. Another Supreme...
From the Right
Progressives Are Leading Joe Biden Astray, AgainAn impromptu focus group of Democratic voters recently convened and conducted by Mark Halperin found that the president’s State of the Union Address had the effect his speechwriters so clearly intended: It made Democrats feel better about Biden’s capacity to run one last campaign.
Those voters said they were enthused by Biden’s renewed vigor. They appreciated the record of legislative achievements Biden pursued in office, and they were energized to vote for Biden again. Many of them cited specific policies they wanted Biden to either pursue in the future or...
AllSides Picks
April 27th, 2024
April 26th, 2024