Supreme Court Wary of Limiting Federal Contact With Social Media Companies
Summary from the AllSides News Team
Supreme Court justices appeared wary of limiting the government’s ability to communicate with social media platforms in a major online speech case on Monday.
For Context: In July 2023, a federal judge ruled that the Biden administration violated the First Amendment by “coercing” or “significantly encouraging” certain content moderation decisions by social media companies, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. The judge’s ruling limited communications between several federal agencies and social media companies. The Biden administration challenged the ruling, but an appeals court largely upheld it.
The Details: Some justices critiqued the claim against the government as overly broad. Justice Elena Kagan compared the issue to governmental communication with journalists, which she said “happens literally thousands of times a day.” Justice Samuel Alito also compared the case to the news media, but said he could not “imagine federal officials taking that approach to the print media.” Justice Brett Kavanaugh noted that “the platforms say no all the time to the government.”
‘Jawboning’: The case involves a practice called “jawboning.” Experts from Columbia University describe jawboning as “informal government efforts to persuade, cajole, or strong-arm private platforms to change their content-moderation practices.”
How the Media Covered It: While most coverage appeared to frame the justices as “skeptical” or “wary,” some right-rated outlets framed them as “divided” and focused on remarks by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Some partisan indicators were present, like NPR’s (Lean Left bias) description of attempts to “combat disinformation online” and the New York Post’s (Lean Right bias) use of the word “censor” instead of “moderate.”
Featured Coverage of this Story
From the Left
Supreme Court Wary of States’ Bid to Limit Federal Contact With Social Media CompaniesA majority of the Supreme Court seemed wary on Monday of a bid by two Republican-led states to limit the Biden administration’s interactions with social media companies, with several justices questioning the states’ legal theories and factual assertions.
Most of the justices appeared convinced that government officials should be able to try to persuade private companies, whether news organizations or tech platforms, not to publish information so long as the requests are not backed by coercive threats.
The dispute was the latest in an extraordinary series of cases this term requiring the...
From the Right
Supreme Court split on White House contact with social media in censorship caseThe Supreme Court weighed a historic First Amendment dispute on Monday between Republican-led states and the Biden administration over how far the federal government can go to combat social media posts on subjects including COVID-19 information, election security, or possible threats.
Oral arguments before the high court on Monday centered on a high-profile lawsuit filed by Louisiana, Missouri, and other parties accusing officials in the Biden administration of relying on social media platforms to censor online viewpoints unconstitutionally, including conservative ideas. Justices appeared to be divided among a variety of ways to handle the final decision in the...
From the Center
US Supreme Court seems wary of curbing US government contacts with social media platformsU.S. Supreme Court justices on Monday appeared skeptical of a challenge on free speech grounds to how President Joe Biden's administration encouraged social media platforms to remove posts that federal officials deemed misinformation, including about elections and COVID-19.
The justices heard oral arguments in the administration's appeal of a lower court's preliminary injunction constraining how White House and certain other federal officials communicate with social media platforms.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
The Republican-led states of Missouri and Louisiana, along with five individual social media users, sued the administration. They argued that the...
AllSides Picks
April 25th, 2024
April 24th, 2024
April 24th, 2024
April 26th, 2024