Fissures Appear in Trump Coalition Over Hawkishness on Iran

As American support for Israel has recently waned, divisions have appeared within President Trump’s cabinet and base over the administration’s approach to dealing with Iran.

Mike Waltz: After Trump removed national security adviser Mike Waltz from his position last week, The Washington Post (Lean Left bias) reported “he had been clashing with other top officials since early in the administration, including over whether to pursue military action against Iran.” The Post said Waltz met with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu separately from Trump and arrived at the conclusion that the time was right for the US and Israel to strike Iran. This reportedly frustrated Trump, who wanted to attempt a diplomatic solution first. Netanyahu has since denied that the two discussed Iran.

Hegseth & Vance: An April 21 opinion from Fred Bauer of UnHerd (Center) highlighted how Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Vice President JD Vance appear to be less in favor of intervening against Iran, and how the White House stood behind Hegseth after a chat where he discussed US attacks on the Houthis leaked. However, Bauer attributed this to politics and not ideology, writing, “the side (whether restrainers or hawks) that becomes too identified with leaks could see themselves frozen out.”

MTG & Tucker: Outside of Trump’s cabinet, one of his top allies, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), criticized the President last week for “losing” his core “base.” Of Iran, Greene wrote, “I campaigned for no more foreign wars. And now we are supposedly on the verge of going to war with Iran.” Another top Trump ally, journalist Tucker Carlson (Right), has consistently condemned the idea that the US should take military action against Iran.

Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.