A fight at the Supreme Court over the government's power to block asylum seekers from reaching ports along the Mexican border may come down to the definition of the word "in.".
There were some prickly moments as the justices heard arguments Tuesday about the legality of a "metering" policy the Obama administration experimented with — and the first Trump administration adopted more broadly — under which Customs and Border Protection agents turned back asylum seekers at the Mexican border.
A federal judge in San Diego and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the practice is illegal because federal law entitles any foreigner who is "physically present in the United States [or] arrives in the United States" to pursue an asylum claim.
Related Coverage
AllSides Picks
Headline Roundup
Trump Calls For SCOTUS To Rehear Birthright Citizenship Case Over 'Birth Package' Hospital Ads
July 10th, 2026
Recommended Reading
Where Can Immigration Enforcement Take Place?: Unpacking ICE’s ‘Sensitive Areas’ Policies from Clinton to Trump
The Alliance for Civic Engagement
July 8th, 2026