The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a provision of the Trump tax cuts that taxed American shareholders of U.S.-controlled foreign companies on otherwise untaxed company earnings. The case, Moore v. United States, generated interest for the potential implications it would have for a wealth tax — specifically, one based on taxing investment gains that have not yet been realized. Ultimately, the Supreme Court punted on this question, describing its decision as “narrow” and “limited.” The majority opinion by Justice Brett Kavanaugh neither opened the door for such a wealth tax nor slammed it shut. The concurring and dissenting opinions, however, made it clear that there are at least four votes among the conservative justices to constitutionally limit taxes to income that has been realized.
However the justices might ultimately rule on such a matter, it doesn’t change the fact that the idea of taxing unrealized gains is a bad one that should be rejected on the merits.
Related Coverage
AllSides Picks
Headline Roundup
Which SCOTUS Cases the Media Wants You to Watch and Why
October 6th, 2026
Headline Roundup
Supreme Court Begins New Term With Strained Trump Relationship and Record-Low Approval Rating
October 5th, 2026
Announcement
Navigating AI, Climate, and the Future of Democracy
AllSides Staff
October 9th, 2026
The Insight
The Insight: Where Israel and Gaza Stand 3 Years After Oct. 7
AllSides Staff
October 9th, 2026
More News about Supreme Court
News from the Left
News from the Center
News from the Right
CNBC