The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a provision of the Trump tax cuts that taxed American shareholders of U.S.-controlled foreign companies on otherwise untaxed company earnings. The case, Moore v. United States, generated interest for the potential implications it would have for a wealth tax β specifically, one based on taxing investment gains that have not yet been realized. Ultimately, the Supreme Court punted on this question, describing its decision as βnarrowβ and βlimited.β The majority opinion by Justice Brett Kavanaugh neither opened the door for such a wealth tax nor slammed it shut. The concurring and dissenting opinions, however, made it clear that there are at least four votes among the conservative justices to constitutionally limit taxes to income that has been realized.
However the justices might ultimately rule on such a matter, it doesnβt change the fact that the idea of taxing unrealized gains is a bad one that should be rejected on the merits.
Related Coverage
AllSides Picks
Headline Roundup
Trump Signs Order Renaming Lake Ontario to Lake America
August 27th, 2026
Headline Roundup
New USPS Mail-In Voting Rules Take Effect After Courts Lift Injunctions
August 27th, 2026
Story of the Week
Meta Settles with 29 States
AllSides Staff
August 27th, 2026
Bias
Announcing Version 12 of the AllSides Media Bias Chart β See Whatβs Changed
AllSides
August 25th, 2026
More News about Supreme Court
News from the Left
News from the Center
News from the Right
CNBC