Three years after the COVID-19 pandemic began, questions and debate over its origins continue.
In particular, the theory that COVID-19 began with a leak from a Chinese laboratory has been one of the most controversial political narratives of the past several years.
- Highlight lack of evidence for lab leak theory
- Frame animal-to-human passage as likely pandemic origin
- In some cases, describe lab leak theory as debunked or conspiratorial
- Highlight lack of evidence for other theories
- Highlight lack of transparency from Chinese government
- Highlight safety concerns at Wuhan lab
Let’s break down the media coverage and dominant opinions around the theory, and highlight the main facts and myths to be aware of.
Table of Contents
- Summary of the Claim
- Recent Developments
- What Scientists have Said
- What the Government has Said
- What the Left has Said
- What the Right has Said
- Is it True or False?
Almost immediately after the COVID-19 pandemic began, people speculated about how it started. Most of this focused on China, where the pandemic began, and specifically on the city of Wuhan.
As early as January 2020, reports of safety concerns and a history of transparency issues at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) began fueling rumors of a possible lab leak, since the lab dealt heavily with coronavirus studies and experiments. Some coverage took it a step further, quoting sources who suggested that the virus could possibly be linked to China’s biowarfare program (At least one of those articles has since been updated to include more skeptical reporting).
President Donald Trump, who at the time was offering daily press briefings and tweeting multiple times per day to roughly 70 million Twitter followers, became one of the theory’s main proponents. He at one point said that he’d seen evidence to suggest the virus leaked from the Chinese lab, but also said he wasn’t allowed to go into detail.
From the beginning, many scientists and global investigators said that COVID-19 almost certainly originated naturally, and shows no evidence of being man-made or genetically engineered.
The much greater divide is on whether the pandemic began with a lab accident at WIV. Some health authorities, such as former CDC Director Robert Redfield, see that as plausible and even probable based on circumstantial evidence. Others, such as infectious disease expert Anthony Fauci, think a natural jump from animals to humans is far more likely.
The Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic and Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence heard testimony from an anonymous CIA whistleblower. A press release stated that the whistleblower alleged,
“The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) offered six analysts significant monetary incentives to change their position on COVID-19’s origin. The whistleblower, who presents as a highly credible senior-level CIA officer, alleges that of the seven members assigned to the CIA team tasked with analyzing COVID-19 origins, six officers concluded that the virus likely originated from a lab in Wuhan, China. The CIA, then however, allegedly offered financial incentives to six of the experts involved in the investigation to change their conclusion in favor of a zoonotic origin.”
In response to the allegation, the committee requested “all documents and communications related to the CIA’s COVID-19 origins review be made immediately available to the Committees” and called on former CIA COO Andrew Makridis to “appear for a voluntary transcribed interview.”
An article published on Substack by Matt Taibbi (Center bias) and others determined a Chinese scientist partially funded by United States grants was one of three scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China to fall ill with COVID-19-like symptoms in November 2019, prior to the outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan.
The report identified Ben Hu as one of the researchers who fell ill at the Wuhan lab. An investigation conducted by the White Coat Waste Project, a watchdog organization working to “cut federal spending that hurts animals and Americans,” cited government records obtained through Freedom of Information Act requests to state that “Ben Hu was a lead experimenter on the dangerous gain-of-function experiments funded by taxpayers via Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).”
According to a Newsweek (Center bias) article, gain-of-function research involves “taking a pathogen and mutating it so that it has a new aspect to it. Often, that new aspect of a virus that it's more transmissible or deadly to humans.”
At first, many scientists leaned away from the lab leak theory and toward the “natural spillover” theory that has been seen with other pandemics and viruses. In February 2020, 27 scientists signed a letter in a peer-reviewed medical journal, The Lancet, saying they “stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.”
But as more information emerged and no hard evidence of how COVID-19 was uncovered, some scientists changed their tune. Another letter published in The Lancet in September 2021, signed by 16 more scientists, said “there is no direct support for the natural origin of SARS-CoV-2, and a laboratory-related accident is plausible.”
A report from evolutionary biologist Michael Worobley in November 2021 argued that the first case of COVID-19 was detected in a vendor at the animal market in Wuhan, and concluded that the market’s “western section where raccoon dogs were caged provides strong evidence of a live-animal market origin of the pandemic.” The World Health Organization (WHO) had previously reported that the first person thought to have contracted COVID-19 was an accountant in Wuhan who had no connection to the market.
Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist and one of the scientists who signed the Sept. 2021 letter, has maintained since early in the pandemic that the lab leak theory is plausible, and has pointed to subpar safety protocols at WIV as a reason the theory can’t be ruled out. He has also accused Dr. Anthony Fauci and other federal health officials of lying about the extent of U.S. coronavirus research and experiments at WIV.
Significant divide remains between U.S. intelligence agencies about the origins of COVID-19.
In May 2021, President Biden called on U.S. intelligence to formally investigate COVID-19’s origins. The ensuing report said that the pandemic "probably emerged and infected humans through an initial small-scale exposure," but that an accidental lab leak or genetic engineering isn't entirely ruled out.
The FBI and the Department of Energy think the lab leak theory is most likely. The National Intelligence Council and other groups believe, with "low confidence," that the natural animal-to-human transmission origin theory is more probable. The CIA remains undecided.
According to a declassified report, the FBI concluded with “moderate confidence” that the pandemic began with a “laboratory accident.”
In October 2022, a Republican-led Senate report concluded that COVID-19 "most likely" leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
In February 2023, the Department of Energy reportedly concluded with "low confidence," based on new, classified intelligence, that the lab leak theory was most plausible.
Republicans have continued calls to probe the Chinese government, which many of them accuse of being shady and uncooperative.
At first, many major media outlets on the left and center reported that the theory was a false conspiracy.
Major influential news sources such as the Associated Press's politics section (Lean Left bias), the New York Times (Lean Left) and the Washington Post (Lean Left) described the entire theory of a lab leak, either accidental or intentional, as “debunked” based on available research and expert opinions at the time.
Amid dismissal of the theory from prominent mainstream media outlets and some scientists, Facebook temporarily censored conversation about the theory and took down posts that discussed it. Some media voices said the theory was racist and accused former President Donald Trump of advancing anti-Asian sentiments by purportedly spreading the theory without sufficient evidence.
Months later, amid ongoing investigations into COVID-19’s origins and lack of consensus from experts, some media outlets have issued corrections and changed their framing, and Facebook reversed its policy.
Most left- and center-rated outlets still report on the theory as if it is highly unlikely. When reporting on the theory, these sources usually focus on quoting experts who cast doubt on it. Some outlets have yet to update reports that described the theory as a false or debunked conspiracy.
From the beginning, right-rated media treated the theory as probable.
Many echoed claims from the Trump administration and some scientists and health experts that China, either accidentally or intentionally, released COVID-19 and ignited a global pandemic. Many believe that, at best, the virus escaped from the lab accidentally. But at worst, they said, China intentionally released the virus as some sort of bioweapon. Arguments in favor of that intentional bioweapon theory have mostly faded away since.
As the evidence has evolved, right-rated outlets have continued to cover the story prominently. Many give the accidental lab leak theory weight equal to or greater than other hypotheses. Some argue that China deserves at least some blame for the millions of deaths and trillions of dollars lost in global economies, even in the absence of hard evidence.
After it was revealed in October that U.S.-funded researchers at WIV failed to report the findings of their coronavirus experiments, which involved attempting to make the viruses more infectious, many right-rated outlets and elsewhere reported on the theory even more confidently.
Some disaffected liberals, such as writer Glenn Greenwald (Center bias), also focus on criticizing Peter Daszak, president of the EcoHealth Alliance, the group that received the U.S. grants to do coronavirus research and then failed to report the results. Daszak was one of the 27 people who signed the original Lancet letter in February 2020, leading Greenwald to question his credibility and media outlets that cite him as a source when covering the leak, such as the New York Times (Lean Left bias).
Coverage and perspectives from the right often sharply criticize how health officials and the mainstream media treated the theory, accusing them of being blindly biased against Trump or in favor of Biden/China.
In response to Worobley’s patient-zero report on the Wuhan animal market, some on the right argued that the fact that the initial COVID-19 cases could be traced to one general region actually points “to the market being a key early spreading event, but not the first.”
At this point, it remains unknown how the COVID-19 pandemic began — whether it happened naturally or accidentally leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
There is no hard evidence for any of the theories mentioned above. However, there is circumstantial evidence, both for the natural animal-to-human spillover theory and for the accidental lab leak theory.
Online data sets from the WIV disappeared for over a year before being reuploaded; coronavirus researchers in China violated the terms of a U.S. grant by not reporting all of the findings from their experiments; and three WIV researchers were hospitalized with COVID-like symptoms in November 2019. In October 2022, ProPublica (Lean Left) reported that on Nov. 12, 2019, a dispatch sent by Chinese Community Party officials at the laboratory "appeared to reference a biosecurity breach."
Despite consensus from U.S. health officials, many scientists, journalists and other health experts say the natural animal-to-human transmission theory is more likely. There’s not yet been definitive evidence of that in the case of COVID-19, but there is plenty of historical precedent for viruses jumping from animals to humans, as well as Worobley’s November report. And In October 2022, a report released by Senate Republicans said that "Based on the analysis of the publicly available information, it appears reasonable to conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic was, more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident."
There is no evidence that the virus was man-made or genetically engineered as a bioweapon. U.S. intelligence agencies have been unanimous in saying that "the virus was not a biological weapon, and that Chinese officials did not have foreknowledge of the virus before the first outbreak."
As of this writing, the public still lacks a definitive conclusion on COVID-19’s origins.
Henry A. Brechter is the managing editor of AllSides. He has a Center bias.
Reviewers and Contributors:
Joseph Ratliff, AllSides Daily News Editor, Lean Left bias
Julie Mastrine, AllSides Director of Marketing, Lean Right bias
Andrew Weinzierl, AllSides Research Assistant, Lean Left bias
John Gable, AllSides CEO and Co-Founder, Lean Right bias
Antonio Ferme, former AllSides Weekend Editor, Center bias
Isaiah Anthony, Deputy Blog Editor, Center bias