Apparently, the Constitution now comes with a permission slip.
According to Minnesota's political class—and the federal judge they are hoping will indulge them—federal immigration law is binding except when local officials find it inconvenient, uncomfortable, or politically risky. In those moments, the thinking goes, the state can simply ask a court to restrain Immigration and Customs Enforcement and call it "constitutional balance."
Thankfully, the Trump administration is having none of it.
In a sharply worded filing this week, the Department of Justice warned that any judicial order limiting ICE operations inside Minnesota would amount to an "unprecedented overreach." That phrasing is not hyperbole. It is the legal equivalent of asking whether we have collectively forgotten how the country works.
Related Coverage
AllSides Picks
Headline Roundup
Tennessee to Require Proof of Citizenship, English Proficiency to Obtain Driver's License
June 19th, 2026
Headline Roundup
EU Approves New Migration Law That Allows Home Raids and Third-Country Deportations
June 18th, 2026
News
Mass Kidnappings, Covid Contingencies, ICE Controversies: Stories You May Have Missed
Malayna J. Bizier
June 18th, 2026
More News about Immigration
News from the Left
News from the Center
News from the Right
The Hill