Supreme Court justices rule state lawmakers do not have exclusive control over elections in key decision
Supreme Court,Voting Rights And Voter Fraud,Elections,2020 Election,Gerrymandering,Redistricting,Mail-In Voting,US Constitution
The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that state judges do have the power to override state legislatures when it comes to how federal elections are carried out.
In a 6-3 opinion authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, the high court ruled that the Elections Clause of Article 1 of the U.S. Constitution "does not insulate state legislatures from the ordinary exercise of state judicial review."
Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett and Ketanji Brown Jackson were in the majority. Justice Clarence Thomas dissented, in which Justice Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito joined.
Related Coverage
AllSides Picks
Headline Roundup
Federal Judge Dismisses Trump's Lawsuit Over WSJ's Epstein 'Birthday Letter' Report
November 2nd, 2026
Headline Roundup
Democratic Rep. Stevens Switches Endorsement From El-Sayed to Republican Rogers in Michigan
November 2nd, 2026
Recommended Reading
When Two States Tell Us the Future
Dan Schnur
November 2nd, 2026
Announcement
Why AllSides Uses the Term ‘Assisted Dying’ and Not ‘Assisted Suicide’
AllSides Staff
October 31st, 2026
More News about Supreme Court
News from the Left
News from the Center
News from the Right
CNBC