US Officially Signs and Reveals Terms of Greenland Security Deal

The US, Denmark, and its territory, Greenland, signed an agreement on Tuesday that expands on a 1951 agreement between the two countries and will give the US more military privileges and solidify the island as a NATO stronghold.

US Defense: The US will be allowed to "modernize and expand its activities" at its Pituffik Space Base and establish additional bases at Narsarsuaq and Mestersvig. It will also be allowed to establish additional defenses in Greenland. Both parties will be able to "identify the need for a new Defense Area for the defense of the North Atlantic Treaty area, Greenland, and the American continent" and are expected to reach an agreement for how it will be implemented within 90 days.

Going Forward: Non-NATO members will be barred from establishing military installations. Countries that are not NATO members or partners, or EU members, and individuals from those countries will be banned from having "control, significant influence, or access to non-public information that may constitute a threat to national security or public order within Particularly Sensitive Sectors or Activities" like critical infrastructure and resource extraction. Exceptions can be made to any of the aforementioned if all three parties involved agree. If Greenland is to become independent, it agrees to seek NATO membership. The agreement has no end date.

Framing: The agreement opens by acknowledging "the long history of cooperation between the Parties based on their deep respect for democracy, human rights, and the rule of law, as well as the more than eighty years of close defense cooperation between them." It also recognizes the US as an "indispensable historical and ongoing" partner for the security of Greenland and the rest of NATO that has been "irreplaceable" and will continue to be so "in the future." Beyond geopolitical relationships, it establishes that "the security situation in the Arctic is changing and that more efforts are needed to ensure security there in the future."

RELATED: China Launches Season's First Arctic Sea Shipment to Europe: A 'New Era' or Premature 'Hype'? | AllSides

Reactions: President Trump, Denmark's Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen, and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte all praised the deal. Rutte said the deal is "great to see" and "enhances our collective security and supports a safer and more stable future for us all." Trump praised the Danish and Greenlandic leaders and said, "We're going to have a tremendous relationship, a secure relationship, and we look forward to it, and we'll be working very hard and very much in conjunction with each other."

Media Split: Headlines and framing were split across the spectrum. Several outlets from the right framed the deal as a huge success for the US and Trump administration, whereas several outlets from the left downplayed its significance, with some even framing it as a failure of Trump's. For instance, in a news headline, Fox News (Right bias) called the deal a "landmark" and The Washington Times' (Lean Right) Editorial Board said it "cements [Trump's] status as a master dealmaker." In news coverage, The New York Times (Lean Left) described Trump as "fixated" on securing control of Greenland and said it's "unclear how the deal will differ from" the 1951 pact. In an analysis, The Times said Trump "fell short" and "settled for something much less." Before the deal was officially signed, The Daily Beast (Left) ran the headline, "Trump Suffers Humiliating Defeat of His Crackpot Plan to Own Greenland."

Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.