Supreme Court Appears Skeptical of Using Obstruction Law to Charge Jan. 6 Rioters
Supreme Court,Capitol Chaos,January 6,Politics,Protests,Donald Trump,Justice Department
The Supreme Court seemed wary on Tuesday of letting prosecutors use a federal obstruction law to charge hundreds of rioters involved in the Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021.
A decision rejecting the government’s interpretation of the law could not only disrupt those prosecutions but also eliminate two of the federal charges against former President Donald J. Trump in the case accusing him of plotting to subvert the 2020 election.
Mr. Trump’s case did not come up at the argument, which was largely focused on trying to make sense of a statute that all concerned agreed was not a model of clarity. But the justices’ questions also considered the gravity of the assault and whether prosecutors have been stretching the law to reach members of the mob responsible for the attack.
Related Coverage
AllSides Picks
Headline Roundup
Pollsters Face Obstacles as 2026 Midterms Approach
November 1st, 2026
Headline Roundup
Binance Works to Recover Billions After What May Be the Largest Hack in History
October 31st, 2026
Announcement
Why AllSides Uses the Term ‘Assisted Dying’ and Not ‘Assisted Suicide’
AllSides Staff
October 31st, 2026
The Insight
Four Issues Defining the 2026 Midterms
AllSides Staff
October 30th, 2026
More News about Supreme Court
News from the Left
News from the Center
News from the Right
CNBC