How the Supreme Court should rule on Texas and Florida laws against social media moderation
Supreme Court,Social Media,Big Tech,Politics,Free Speech,Technology
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in two cases that could have a profound effect on the future of the internet and social media.
The cases — NetChoice vs. Paxton and Moody vs. NetChoice — involve laws in Texas and Florida that prohibit social media companies from removing content from their platforms, clearly violating the 1st Amendment rights of private companies. If these laws are upheld, they will make the internet and social media enormously worse.
The Texas law bars social media platforms with at least 50 million active users — such as Facebook, X (formerly Twitter) and YouTube — from removing content based on the views expressed. The Florida law prohibits them from removing speech by political candidates and “journalistic enterprises”; it also requires them to notify users of any content moderation decisions and provide an explanation.
Related Coverage
AllSides Picks
Headline Roundup
USAID Report Claims Over 100 UNRWA Employees Participated in October 7 Attacks
August 28th, 2026
Headline Roundup
Alleged Grand Jury Report Accuses DeSantis Administration of Misappropriating $10 Million
August 28th, 2026
Bias
Will Data Centers Create Blackouts? Examining Media Bias and Misinformation on The Tucker Carlson Show
Julie Mastrine
August 28th, 2026
The Insight
The Insight: How the Lindsay Clancy Case Became a Misinformation Chamber
AllSides Staff
August 28th, 2026
More News about Supreme Court
News from the Left
News from the Center
News from the Right
CNBC