Supreme Court rules on challenge to Biden admin’s effort to influence social media
Supreme Court,Social Media,Free Speech,Content Moderation,Censorship,Misinformation And Disinformation,Amy Coney Barrett,Samuel Alito,Federal State And Tribal Powers,Big Tech,Technology
The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled in favor of the Biden administration in a challenge to its alleged coordination with social media companies, saying that the states who sued the administration lacked standing.
The case, Murthy v. Missouri, stems from a lawsuit brought by state attorneys general from Missouri and Louisiana that accused high-ranking government officials of working with giant social media companies "under the guise of combating misinformation" that ultimately led to censoring speech on topics that included Hunter Biden’s laptop, COVID-19 origins and the efficacy of face masks.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the majority, said the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring their challenge.
Related Coverage
AllSides Picks
Headline Roundup
US-Canada Trade Negotiations Fail, Canada to Levy Retaliatory Tariffs
August 23rd, 2026
Headline Roundup
Trump Moves to Cut Beef Prices With Import Tariff Waiver
August 22nd, 2026
The Insight
The Insight: Back to School, Behind on Reading: Why America’s Literacy Crisis Persists
AllSides Staff
August 21st, 2026
Story of the Week
The Jason Arday Saga
AllSides Staff
August 20th, 2026