Skip to main content

Supreme Court rules on challenge to Biden admin’s effort to influence social media

Supreme Court,Social Media,Free Speech,Content Moderation,Censorship,Misinformation And Disinformation,Amy Coney Barrett,Samuel Alito,Federal State And Tribal Powers,Big Tech,Technology

From the Right

The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled in favor of the Biden administration in a challenge to its alleged coordination with social media companies, saying that the states who sued the administration lacked standing. 

The case, Murthy v. Missouri, stems from a lawsuit brought by state attorneys general from Missouri and Louisiana that accused high-ranking government officials of working with giant social media companies "under the guise of combating misinformation" that ultimately led to censoring speech on topics that included Hunter Biden’s laptop, COVID-19 origins and the efficacy of face masks.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the majority, said the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring their challenge.

AllSides Picks

More News about Supreme Court

News from the Left

News from the Center

News from the Right