Supreme Court rules on challenge to Biden admin’s effort to influence social media
Supreme Court,Social Media,Free Speech,Content Moderation,Censorship,Misinformation And Disinformation,Amy Coney Barrett,Samuel Alito,Federal State And Tribal Powers,Big Tech,Technology
The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled in favor of the Biden administration in a challenge to its alleged coordination with social media companies, saying that the states who sued the administration lacked standing.
The case, Murthy v. Missouri, stems from a lawsuit brought by state attorneys general from Missouri and Louisiana that accused high-ranking government officials of working with giant social media companies "under the guise of combating misinformation" that ultimately led to censoring speech on topics that included Hunter Biden’s laptop, COVID-19 origins and the efficacy of face masks.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the majority, said the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring their challenge.
Related Coverage
AllSides Picks
Headline Roundup
CDC Declares End to Cyclospora Outbreak Despite Ongoing Investigations
September 11th, 2026
Headline Roundup
25th Anniversary of 9/11 Prompts Debate Over the Attack's Legacy
September 11th, 2026
News
What the Media Missed: Children Recovered, Heat Deaths Soared, and More
Malayna J. Bizier
September 12th, 2026
Misinformation Watch
Misinformation Watch: Was Zelenskyy’s Plane ‘Almost Hit’ by a Drone in Moldova?
Andy Gorel
September 12th, 2026
More News about Supreme Court
News from the Left
News from the Center
News from the Right
CNBC