Law Professor Highlights the Obvious About Hunter Biden's Bank Records

Katie wrote about it yesterday. It might take a few weeks, maybe months, because the media is bound to salivate over the impending fourth indictment of Donald Trump in the Georgia 2020 election investigation. Still, they’ll have to return to the emerging Biden bribery scandal. There’s too much money and credible witness testimony to dismiss the Biden bribery scandal as a nothing burger. It’s not Russian disinformation. The establishment press and their intelligence community and social media allies tried that, only to be forced to admit that Hunter Biden’s laptop was genuine.

Since then, the Justice Department has meddled in IRS investigations into the president’s son. Those operations could usher impeachment hearings for Attorney General Merrick Garland, but that’s another battle. The FD-1023 report from the FBI’s informant, who's been feeding the bureau intelligence on the Bidens’ relationship with Burisma since 2018, details a hefty bribery scheme, where $10 million was doled out to Joe and Hunter in 2015-16. 

Now, we have Hunter’s bank records, where millions were wired to the family, including from corrupt Central Asian oligarchs. You can’t deliver the ‘I know nothing’ defense, Joe, when your son collected $20 million in these sleazy deals. Either you had prior knowledge, or your dementia is now so severe that the 25th Amendment should be invoked. There’s no illusion of access here, a pathetic attempt by Democrats at linguistic gymnastics to rationalize these business deals. That can’t exist when there’s this much money involved.