Jan. 6 Panel Has Evidence for Criminal Referral of Trump, but Splits on Sending
2020 Election,Capitol Chaos,Criminal Justice,Courts,Donald Trump,Elections,Election Integrity,Justice,Liz Cheney,Media Bias,Media Industry,New York Times,Republican Party,US Capitol,US Congress
The leaders of the House committee investigating the Capitol attack have grown divided over whether to make a criminal referral to the Justice Department of former President Donald J. Trump, even though they have concluded that they have enough evidence to do so, people involved in the discussions said.
The debate centers on whether making a referral β a largely symbolic act β would backfire by politically tainting the Justice Departmentβs expanding investigation into the Jan. 6 assault and what led up to it.
Since last summer, a team of former federal prosecutors working for the committee has focused on documenting the attack and the preceding efforts by Mr. Trump and his allies to reverse his defeat in the 2020 election. The panel plans to issue a detailed report on its findings, but in recent months it has regularly signaled that it was also weighing a criminal referral that would pressure Attorney General Merrick B. Garland to open a criminal investigation into Mr. Trump.
Related Coverage
AllSides Picks
Red Blue Translator
Social Justice
Headline Roundup
Democrats Win Congress Despite Republican Redistricting Push
November 5th, 2026
Headline Roundup
What the 'Blue Wave' Means for US-Israel Relations
November 5th, 2026
Recommended Reading
Does Free Enterprise Still Give Americans a Fair Shot?
Guest Writer
November 5th, 2026