Jan. 6 Panel Has Evidence for Criminal Referral of Trump, but Splits on Sending
2020 Election,Capitol Chaos,Criminal Justice,Courts,Donald Trump,Elections,Election Integrity,Justice,Liz Cheney,Media Bias,Media Industry,New York Times,Republican Party,US Capitol,US Congress
The leaders of the House committee investigating the Capitol attack have grown divided over whether to make a criminal referral to the Justice Department of former President Donald J. Trump, even though they have concluded that they have enough evidence to do so, people involved in the discussions said.
The debate centers on whether making a referral — a largely symbolic act — would backfire by politically tainting the Justice Department’s expanding investigation into the Jan. 6 assault and what led up to it.
Since last summer, a team of former federal prosecutors working for the committee has focused on documenting the attack and the preceding efforts by Mr. Trump and his allies to reverse his defeat in the 2020 election. The panel plans to issue a detailed report on its findings, but in recent months it has regularly signaled that it was also weighing a criminal referral that would pressure Attorney General Merrick B. Garland to open a criminal investigation into Mr. Trump.
Related Coverage
AllSides Picks
Bias
Media Bias Alert: The DOJ Revokes Its ‘Integration Mandate’ for People With Disabilities
Malayna J. Bizier
September 2nd, 2026
Red Blue Translator
Social Justice
Headline Roundup
Lindsay Clancy Holdout Juror Speaks Out: 'I Didn't Have Any Doubts'
September 21st, 2026
News
The European Conservative Shuts Down as Hungarian Government Nationalizes Assets
Andy Gorel
September 20th, 2026