Supreme Court Probe Fails to Find Roe Leaker
Summary from AllSides News Team
A nine-month investigation of who leaked the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision was inconclusive, according to the court.
The Details: Chief Justice John Roberts selected the marshal of the Supreme Court to conduct the probe, and later asked an outside group, the Chertoff Group, to help. The 97 court employees interviewed for the investigation all denied involvement in the leak, and there were reportedly no signs of a technological breach. Some employees did admit talking to family members about the draft opinion and how the justices had voted.
For Context: The court’s decision to overturn Roe v Wade leaked in May 2022, an unprecedented breach of the court that reframed the national political conversation around abortion.
Key Quotes: According to a 20-page public copy of the probe, "the team has to date been unable to identify a person responsible by a preponderance of the evidence," but "To the extent that additional investigation yields new evidence or leads, the investigators will pursue them."
How the Media Covered It: The news was a top story across the political spectrum. Some right-rated sources focused more on Republicans, such as Sen. Ted Cruz (R), who criticized the court's failure to bring the leaker to justice.
Featured Coverage of this Story
From the LeftSupreme Court says it is unable to identify the person who leaked draft of abortion ruling
The Supreme Court on Thursday announced that after a lengthy investigation it has been unable to conclusively identify the person who leaked an unpublished draft of an opinion indicating the court was poised to roll back abortion rights.
In an unsigned statement, the court said that all leads had been followed up and forensic analysis performed, but "the team has to date been unable to identify a person responsible by a preponderance of the evidence."
The attached report suggested the court was not watertight, with some employees admitting they had talked to...
From the CenterSupreme Court investigators fail to identify who leaked Dobbs opinion
The Supreme Court has not been able to determine who leaked a draft of Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the court said on Thursday.
The unprecedented leak last May revealed that the court was privately poised to overturn the court’s landmark decisions establishing a constitutional right to an abortion. The court indicated on Thursday that investigators would continue to review some additional evidence, but the court’s two-page statement left open the possibility that the source of the leak may never be found.
The court’s statement denounced the...
From the RightSupreme Court's report on Dobbs investigation fails to find draft leaker
After nearly nine months of an investigation into who leaked a draft decision signaling overturning Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court announced Thursday its investigation is inconclusive.
The court released a 20-page public copy of the investigation. Chief Justice John Roberts initially tapped the marshal of the Supreme Court to conduct the investigation, but Roberts later asked an outside group known as the Chertoff Group to aid in the process of the investigation.
Regarding Supreme Court Marshal Gail Anne Curley's investigation, an unsigned statement of the report notes: "[i]nvestigators continue to review and process some electronic data that has...