Headline Roundup • April 5th, 2023
How Strong Are The 34 Felony Charges Against Donald Trump?
Summary from the AllSides News Team
How strong are the Manhattan District Attorney’s charges against former President Donald Trump?
Strong: A writer in Newsweek (Center Bias) stated that the charges were more serious than Trump expected, believing the fraud charges will taint Trump’s image and damage his 2024 chances, stating, “If Trump wins their nomination, which remains possible, he will emerge as a pariah in the eyes of normie voters and go on to face President Biden, to whom he already lost by 7 million votes in 2020.” A writer in CNN argued in favor of the legal theory backing the charges and determined that “Trump’s strong reaction shows he understands their seriousness. Bragg did the right thing when he said he would not be deterred by such intimidation – just as he was right to bring this case.”
Weak: Matt Lewis stated that “Tuesday’s not-so-big reveal has me wondering if maybe there’s a reason other prosecutors have declined to pursue these charges in the past.” A writer in Vox (Left Bias) outlined the legal theory being cited to elevate the charges to the felony level, determining the D.A. “has built one of the most controversial and high-profile criminal cases in American history upon the most uncertain of foundations. And that foundation could crumble into dust if the courts reject his legal arguments on a genuinely ambiguous question of law.” David French deemed Trump’s hush money payments “immoral,” but questioned if they were “unlawful,” which he states is “the key question that will decide Trump’s legal fate.”
Featured Coverage of this Story

Illustration by Elizabeth Brockway/The Daily Beast/Reuters
Everyone hoping that the Manhattan District Attorney would finally take down Donald Trump was—let’s be honest—pinning their hopes on the notion that there would be a surprise dispositive smoking gun proving massive fraud. On Tuesday, those hopes failed to materialize.
When the indictment was finally unsealed, we were left with charges pretty close to what everyone was already predicting: a case that is largely about falsifying business records.
Most of the observers I saw were underwhelmed. “[District Attorney Alvin] Bragg explaining why it was vital to indict Trump frankly sounds...
This week brought an unprecedented event in American history – the first criminal charges against a former president. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg unveiled an indictment against Donald Trump with 34 counts of violating New York State’s law against maintaining false books and records by concealing hush money payments to his alleged former mistress, adult film actress Stephanie Clifford, also known as Stormy Daniels.
In an accompanying statement of facts, Bragg alleges the payments were intended to benefit Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign by avoiding a damaging scandal. Trump denies any...

Jason Nocito for The New York Times
Late last month I wrote exactly the kind of piece that makes every legal analyst nervous. I tried to anticipate the Manhattan grand jury’s indictment of Donald Trump and to evaluate its (likely) merits. In my view then, an indictment wouldn’t be frivolous, but it would be unwise — mainly because it was expected to rely on a largely untested legal theory that would transform the business falsification misdemeanors Trump is accused of into felonies by tying the misdemeanors to other crimes that either hadn’t been prosecuted or rest on...
AllSides Picks
Headline Roundup
Trump Orders Immediate Repairs to Reflecting Pool and Police Arrest 5, Including US Olympian
June 22nd, 2026
Headline Roundup
Is Algae Already Growing Again in the Renovated Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool?
June 16th, 2026