The court serves up immunity. The threat of an autocratic presidency soars.
Donald Trump,Supreme Court,Presidential Immunity,Jack Smith
More than six months after special counsel Jack Smith asked the Supreme Court for expedited review, and more than two months after oral argument, the Supreme Court held on Monday what every reasonable American already understood: Presidents do not get blanket immunity for crimes committed in office. However, the right-wing majority put its thumb heavily on the scale, thereby chopping off part of the indictment (i.e. consultation with the Justice Department) and setting the stage for a complex evaluation by the lower court as to the remainder of the conduct (e.g. conversation with the vice president, public statements), which may still be subject to criminal prosecution.
Related Coverage
AllSides Picks
Recommended Reading
When AOC Takes a Step Back—and Possibly Forward
Dan Schnur
August 24th, 2026
News
Tracking Trump’s Campaign Promises
AllSides Staff
August 13th, 2026
Headline Roundup
Americans Mourn the Death of Country Music Icon Dolly Parton
August 25th, 2026
Headline Roundup
Trump Administration Weighs Visa Revocations for Foreigners Who Apply for Asylum
August 25th, 2026