The court serves up immunity. The threat of an autocratic presidency soars.
Donald Trump,Supreme Court,Presidential Immunity,Jack Smith
More than six months after special counsel Jack Smith asked the Supreme Court for expedited review, and more than two months after oral argument, the Supreme Court held on Monday what every reasonable American already understood: Presidents do not get blanket immunity for crimes committed in office. However, the right-wing majority put its thumb heavily on the scale, thereby chopping off part of the indictment (i.e. consultation with the Justice Department) and setting the stage for a complex evaluation by the lower court as to the remainder of the conduct (e.g. conversation with the vice president, public statements), which may still be subject to criminal prosecution.
Related Coverage
AllSides Picks
Headline Roundup
Trump's Increasing AI Content Usage: Bombing Iran, Claiming the Moon, Arm Wrestling Hulk Hogan, and More
September 9th, 2026
Recommended Reading
When a Convention Vanishes Without a Trace
Dan Schnur
September 14th, 2026
The Insight
The Insight: How Much Are Trade Battles Costing You?
AllSides Staff
September 11th, 2026
Headline Roundup
US Reveals It Has Deployed Weapons in Space
September 15th, 2026