Supreme Court Wary of States’ Bid to Limit Federal Contact With Social Media Companies
Supreme Court,Free Speech,Censorship,Content Moderation,Misinformation And Disinformation,Biden Administration,Coronavirus
A majority of the Supreme Court seemed wary on Monday of a bid by two Republican-led states to limit the Biden administration’s interactions with social media companies, with several justices questioning the states’ legal theories and factual assertions.
Most of the justices appeared convinced that government officials should be able to try to persuade private companies, whether news organizations or tech platforms, not to publish information so long as the requests are not backed by coercive threats.
The dispute was the latest in an extraordinary series of cases this term requiring the justices to assess the meaning of free speech in the internet era.
Justices Brett M. Kavanaugh and Elena Kagan, both former White House lawyers, said interactions between administration officials and news outlets provided a valuable analogy. Efforts by officials to influence coverage are, they said, part of a valuable dialogue that is not prohibited by the First Amendment.
Related Coverage
AllSides Picks
Headline Roundup
DOJ Says Chinese Hackers Targeted US Federal Agencies
August 26th, 2026
Headline Roundup
Meta Agrees to New Facebook, Instagram Limits for Teens in $18 Million Settlement
August 26th, 2026
Bias
Announcing Version 12 of the AllSides Media Bias Chart — See What’s Changed
AllSides
August 25th, 2026
Announcement
The AllSides Student Journalism Award Opens Sept. 1
AllSides Staff
August 24th, 2026