Appeals Court Rules Biden Admin Violated First Amendment, Narrows Prior Ruling From Lower Court
Summary from AllSides News Team
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Friday that the Biden administration violated the First Amendment in its attempts to pressure social media platforms to take down controversial content, particularly about COVID-19 and election fraud.
The Details: The court, made up of two George W. Bush nominees, and one Trump nominee, ruled Biden, the CDC, the FBI, and the surgeon general cannot “coerce” social media companies to remove content it deems problematic. The ruling is a narrowing in scope of a ruling made by a lower-court federal judge in July that included other agencies like the Department of Homeland Security and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) in the prohibition.
Key Quotes: Speaking of the narrowing, the 5th Circuit said the July ruling was "overbroad" because it prohibited the administration from "engaging in legal conduct." It added, "Nine of the preliminary injunction’s ten prohibitions risk doing just that. Moreover, many of the provisions are duplicative of each other and thus unnecessary." A White House official said, “Our consistent view remains that social media platforms have a critical responsibility to take account of the effects their platforms are having on the American people, but make independent choices about the information they present.”
How The Media Covered It: The Washington Post (Lean Left bias) said the “decision was likely to be seen as victory for conservatives,” but highlighted a perspective from a former CISA chief that said the ruling “eviscerated” the lower court’s decision.
Featured Coverage of this Story
From the Left5th Circuit finds Biden White House, CDC likely violated First Amendment
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit on Friday ruled that the Biden White House, top government health officials and the FBI likely violated the First Amendment by improperly influencing tech companies’ decisions to remove or suppress posts on the coronavirus and elections.
The decision was likely to be seen as victory for conservatives who’ve long argued that social media platforms’ content moderation efforts restrict their free speech rights. But some advocates also said the ruling was an improvement over a temporary injunction U.S. District Judge Terry A. Doughty issued July...
From the CenterCourt eases curbs on Biden administration's contacts with social media firms
A federal appeals court on Friday ruled the White House, the FBI and top health officials may not "coerce or significantly encourage" social-media companies to remove content the Biden administration considers misinformation, including about COVID-19.
But the three-judge panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals narrowed much of an injunction issued by a Louisiana judge that restricted Democratic President Joe Biden's administration from communicating with social-media companies.
The court placed that injunction on hold for 10 days so the administration could seek the U.S. Supreme Court's review. The...
From the RightBiden administration violated First Amendment over COVID-19 content on social media, court of appeals rules
The Biden administration "ran afoul" of the First Amendment by trying to pressure social media platforms over controversial COVID-19 content, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans ruled Friday.
In its 75-page ruling, the appeals court, made up of two George W. Bush nominees and one Trump nominee, said that President Biden, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the FBI and the surgeon general cannot "coerce" social media platforms to remove content it deems problematic.
However, in its ruling, the court threw out language from a Louisiana judge in July who...