No, the Threat to U.S. Interests Need Not Be 'Imminent' for POTUS to Use Force Unilaterally
Federal State And Tribal Powers,Iran,Trump Agenda,US Congress,Donald Trump,War,Transparency,Middle East
In "Democrats Question Trump's Urgency to Attack Iran," New York Times reporter Minho Kim asserts:
The lawmakers questioned whether the United States faced an "imminent" threat from Iran, an assertion Mr. Trump made on Saturday, and a legal requirement for the president to initiate military action without congressional authorization. [Emphasis added.]
There is no such legal requirement. And I say this as someone who has repeatedly argued that the Constitution's default position is that the president must seek congressional authorization prior to using force...
Related Coverage
AllSides Picks
Headline Roundup
Man Arrested at Trump National Golf Club After Allegedly Posing as Security
August 5th, 2026
Headline Roundup
Saudis, Silver Lake, Jared Kushner's Affinity Acquire Electronic Arts for $55 Billion
August 5th, 2026
Recommended Reading
Courts, Crackdowns, and Civil Right Violations: 6 New Stories You Probably Havenβt Seen
Malayna J. Bizier
August 5th, 2026
Recommended Reading
When the DSA Moment Has Arrived
Dan Schnur
August 3rd, 2026