No, the Threat to U.S. Interests Need Not Be 'Imminent' for POTUS to Use Force Unilaterally
Federal State And Tribal Powers,Iran,Trump Agenda,US Congress,Donald Trump,War,Transparency,Middle East
In "Democrats Question Trump's Urgency to Attack Iran," New York Times reporter Minho Kim asserts:
The lawmakers questioned whether the United States faced an "imminent" threat from Iran, an assertion Mr. Trump made on Saturday, and a legal requirement for the president to initiate military action without congressional authorization. [Emphasis added.]
There is no such legal requirement. And I say this as someone who has repeatedly argued that the Constitution's default position is that the president must seek congressional authorization prior to using force...
Related Coverage
AllSides Picks
Headline Roundup
Europe Sees Second Consecutive Weekend of Widespread Protests and Violence
October 25th, 2026
Headline Roundup
Former FBI Officials Charged With Lying to Congress About Hunter Biden Laptop Investigation
October 24th, 2026
Bias
Media Bias Alert: Are OB-GYNs Fleeing Idaho Because of Abortion Bans?
Emily Allen
October 23rd, 2026
Opinion
Are Fake Polls Good for Democracy? Not By Themselves
Evan Wagner
October 23rd, 2026