Lawyers could face ‘severe’ penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns
The High Court of England and Wales says lawyers need to take stronger steps to prevent the misuse of artificial intelligence in their work. In a ruling tying together two recent cases, Judge Victoria Sharp wrote that generative AI tools like ChatGPT “are not capable of conducting reliable legal research.” “Such tools can produce apparently coherent and plausible responses to prompts, but those coherent and plausible responses may turn out to be entirely incorrect,” Judge Sharp wrote. “The responses may make confident assertions that are simply untrue.” That doesn’t mean...
Related Coverage
AllSides Picks
Headline Roundup
Jensen Huang's Reported Ties to Suspected Chinese Spy Draw Scrutiny Over National Security
November 12th, 2026
Headline Roundup
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Resigns
November 11th, 2026
Story of the Week
Jensen Huang Resigns from Nvidia
AllSides
November 12th, 2026
Recommended Reading
Can Technology Help Repair Our Divided Democracy?
John Gable, AllSides Co-founder
October 19th, 2026