Federal judge torches Biden admin for 'colluding' with activist group on asylum rule: 'Frenemies'
A judge on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in an extraordinary dissent to a motion related to the Biden administration’s rule limiting asylum, scorched the administration for what he called "collusion" with an immigration activist group to put the rule on ice.
The case involves the Biden administration’s "Circumvention of Lawful Pathways" rule, which the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced last year as Title 42 ended. The rule limits asylum claims, barring those who have crossed illegally and failed to claim asylum in a country through which they have already traveled.
The administration said it was a key part of its efforts to control the crisis at the border, but it was soon blocked by a lawsuit by a liberal activist group. The administration then appealed that decision. However, both sides filed an appeal to put it into abeyance pending discussions of a settlement.
Related Coverage
AllSides Picks
Headline Roundup
Trump Administration Weighs Visa Revocations for Foreigners Who Apply for Asylum
August 25th, 2026
Headline Roundup
Unauthorized Migrant Murders VA Woman, Outlets Split on Significance of Immigration Status
August 20th, 2026
News
Tracking Trump’s Campaign Promises
AllSides Staff
August 13th, 2026
Recommended Reading
Courts, Crackdowns, and Civil Right Violations: 6 New Stories You Probably Haven’t Seen
Malayna J. Bizier
August 5th, 2026