Trump’s actions on pandemic relief aren’t illegal. They’re just ineffective.
Coronavirus,Donald Trump,White House,Executive Orders,Life During Covid-19
Within hours of President Trump’s announcement Saturday that his administration would provide pandemic-related relief to millions of Americans, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle assailed the move as yet another instance of presidential overreach. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) — who don’t agree on much — settled on the same phrase to describe the president’s actions: “unconstitutional slop.”
That’s understandable — but wrong. Trump has so often exceeded normal limits on presidential authority that it is easy to assume unlawfulness on his part. But the problem with Trump’s actions in this instance isn’t that they are illegal or unconstitutional. It’s that they promise to be inadequate and ineffective. They are, at best, Band-Aids on an open wound. Still, they are Band-Aids that Trump has legal authority to apply under the power that Congress has allowed him to exercise in a disaster.
Related Coverage
AllSides Picks
Headline Roundup
Record Early Voter Turnout in 2026 Midterms: Which Party Stands to Benefit?
November 3rd, 2026
Headline Roundup
How the Left and Right Embraced Different Narratives Heading Into the Midterms
November 3rd, 2026
Recommended Reading
Villain or Hero? How the Left and Right Covered the Lone Holdout Juror in the Lindsay Clancy Trial
Jamie Krstev
November 3rd, 2026
Announcement
We're Hiring: Director of Research at AllSides
AllSides Staff
November 2nd, 2026