Skip to main content

Headline Roundup February 24th, 2026

Supreme Court Rules Americans Cannot Sue USPS for Intentionally Withholding Mail

Summary from the AllSides News Team

The Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that Americans cannot sue the US Postal Service (USPS) for intentionally withholding or mishandling mail. 

The Case: The court ruled 5-4 against Texas landlord Lebene Konan in "Postal Service v. Konan." Konan, who is black, alleged that two USPS workers refused to deliver mail to her and her tenants for two years as part of a "racially motivated harassment campaign." Konan reportedly submitted dozens of complaints before filing a lawsuit against USPS under the 1946 Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). The FTCA allows certain damages lawsuits to be filed against the US and bypass the country's sovereign immunity. However, a "postal exception" disallows lawsuits "arising out of the loss, miscarriage or negligent transmission of letters or postal matter."

Majority Opinion: Justice Clarence Thomas, backed by conservative Justices Samuel Alito, Jr., Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh and John Roberts, wrote that "miscarriage of mail" does not regard mail carriers' intentions. He asserted that the FTCA does not alter the government's sovereign immunity in cases such as Konan's, and he argued that ruling in Konan's favor would open the doors to an influx of similar lawsuits without fair justifications.

Dissenting Opinion: Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that Thomas' argument about the potential for inundations of lawsuits did not justify the ruling. She argued that undelivered mail due to "malicious reasons" does fall under the FTCA and is "outside of the exception's scope." Liberal Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan, as well as conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch, joined Sotomayor in dissent. 

How The Media Covered It: Media across the spectrum gave voice to both the majority and dissent. The Hill (Center bias), for instance, emphasized the back-and-forth between the opinions and juxtaposed various points of disagreement. Some media on the left, such as Associated Press (Left), focused more prominently on Konan's allegations than on the Postal Service's defenses. Meanwhile, some media on the right, such as Fox News (Right), exhibited a slanted bias toward the defense and Thomas' ruling.

Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.

Featured Coverage of this Story

Postal Service can't be sued for intentionally not delivering mail, Supreme Court rules in 5-4 split
News

The U.S. Postal Service cannot be sued for damages for intentionally failing to deliver mail, the Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision released Tuesday.

The majority opinion, written by Justice Clarence Thomas, ruled the government's sovereign immunity bars claims for undelivered mail.

"The United States enjoys sovereign immunity and cannot be sued without its consent," Thomas wrote, citing the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) granting "sovereign immunity for a wide range of claims about mail."...

Open on Fox News Digital
Supreme Court shields Postal Service from lawsuits over intentionally undelivered mail
Supreme Court shields Postal Service from lawsuits over intentionally undelivered mail

via The Hill

News

The Supreme Court on Monday said the U.S. Postal Service may not be sued for intentionally failing to deliver the mail, ruling against a Black landlord who claims her carriers racially discriminated against her.

The justices ruled 5-4 that an exception for mail issues carved out of the statute allowing certain lawsuits for damages against the government by Congress covers acts alleged to be deliberate.

Open on The Hill
Supreme Court rules the Postal Service can't be sued, even when mail is intentionally not delivered
News

A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that Americans can't sue the U.S. Postal Service, even when employees deliberately refuse to deliver mail.

By a 5-4 vote, the justices ruled against a Texas landlord, Lebene Konan, who alleges her mail was intentionally withheld for two years. Konan, who is Black, claims racial prejudice played a role in postal employees' actions.

Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for a majority of five conservative justices, said the federal law that generally shields the Postal Service from lawsuits over missing, lost and undelivered mail includes...

Open on Associated Press

More headline roundups

More News about Supreme Court on AllSides

News from the Left

News from the Center

News from the Right