Should Affirmative Action Be Upheld or Struck Down by SCOTUS?
Summary from the AllSides News Team
The Supreme Court is currently deciding on the future of affirmative action. The conservative-majority court is expected to strike down the policy as unconstitutional. In light of this, scholars, legal experts, and college professors are offering perspectives on the value or harm of affirmative action.
For Affirmative Action: Arguments in favor cite historical institutions of racial discrimination as lingering on, with a writer for Slate stating white supremacy remains an issue, “no matter how badly the conservative justices wish to believe these problems have vaporized, gone, worked themselves out.” A writer for The Atlantic (Left Bias) states that ending affirmative action would be a step back for racial progress in America, writing, “Black students won’t just remain at the back of the line in American life; they will be pushed even further back.”
Against Affirmative Action: Arguments against cast doubt on the effectiveness of the policy in achieving equality, questioning the emphasis placed on diversity in college admissions processes. A writer for the Washington Examiner writes, “diversity, though a vaguely defined term at best, is certainly important but should not be sought blindly,” arguing that affirmative action policies reinforce notions of race-based discrimination. A writer for Newsweek (Center Bias) argues affirmative action policies work against asian students, writing, “race-conscious admission, once seen as a tool for combatting racial bias, now provokes it.”
Common Ground: There is a strong sentiment on both sides of the argument that racial inequality is a bad thing. The disagreement comes from the solution to the problem.
Featured Coverage of this Story
From the Right
Affirmative action in college admissions is about to end, and that’s a good thingAffirmative action in college admissions is racist, ineffective, and pernicious. The Supreme Court heard a challenge to its legality this week and seems likely to strike it down as a violation of the Constitution. If this is the court’s decision next year, it would be long overdue.
Racism means prejudice and discrimination based on race. Prejudice refers to making decisions and conclusions about a person based on the person’s race and not on reason or actual experience. Identity politics runs in this vein because it groups people based on the...
From the Center
Supreme Court may overturn race-based school admissions: Here’s what you need to knowAffirmative action will be thrust into the spotlight next week as the Supreme Court prepares to hear two cases: Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina.
A ruling on the two cases by the conservative court could reverse 40 years of precedent of race-conscious admissions to colleges and universities.
Here’s what you need to know.
What is affirmative action?
Affirmative action broadly refers to policies that favor individuals who have been subject to previous discrimination.
At the nation’s universities, it has...
From the Left
The Supreme Court Has No Reason to End Affirmative Action. They’re Doing It Anyway.Oral arguments in a pair of much-anticipated cases about the future of affirmative action sprawled over almost six hours on Monday, yet the outcome was obvious within the first 30 minutes: The Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority appears poised to overturn almost 50 years of precedent and outlaw race-conscious admissions at institutions of higher education. One case—arising from the University of North Carolina’s affirmative action program—was argued over two and a half hours. The second, a challenge to Harvard’s program, took up the better part of the afternoon. These arguments suggested...
AllSides Picks
April 25th, 2024
April 24th, 2024
April 25th, 2024
Discuss & Debate race and racism
April 28 at 5pm PT / 8pm ET Crossing Party Lines