Trump v. IRS Settlement Exempts Trump from Audits, Establishes $1.8B 'Anti-Weaponization Fund'

President Donald Trump and his financial affiliates are exempt from all historically-related International Revenue Service (IRS) audits, according to an addendum released by the Justice Department (DOJ) on Tuesday.

The Details: The addendum succeeds the "Trump v. Internal Revenue Service" lawsuit that reached a settlement on Monday. Trump initially filed the $10 billion lawsuit in January, along with two civil claims related to the Russia collision probe into Trump and the Mar-a-Lago raid on his property in 2022. The settlement asserts that Trump was targeted for "improper and unlawful political, personal, and/or ideological reasons," which are classified as "lawfare" and "weaponization." It drops the lawsuits in a unique exchange that authorizes "compensation and operation" for a $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund."

RELATED: Biden Admin 'Weaponized' the FACE Act: DOJ Report | AllSides

For Context: Trump opted not to publicize his tax returns in 2016 and 2020, criticizing the IRS for its previous audits on him and generally "very bad" treatment. Former IRS contractor Charles Edward Littlejohn pleaded guilty in 2024 to leaking Trump's tax data to two news outlets in 2018 and 2020. The legal documents do not name the outlets, though The New York Times (Lean Left bias) and ProPublica (Lean Left) released controversial reports on Trump's tax dealings during that time. The leak prompted "Trump v. Internal Revenue Service," in which the president sought the $10 billion in damages.

The Addendum: "The United States releases, waives, acquits, and forever discharges each of the plaintiffs from, and is hereby forever barred and precluded from prosecuting or pursuing, any and all claims, counterclaims, causes of action, appeals, or requests for any relief, including injunctive relief, monetary relief, damages, examinations or similar or related reviews, appeals, debt relief, costs, attorney's fees, expenses, and/or interest, whether presently known or unknown, that – as of the effective date of the settlement agreement – have been or could have been asserted by defendants against any of the plaintiffs or related or affiliated individuals (including, without limitation, family, or others filing jointly), or parties…"

Bipartisan Criticisms: News outlets across the political spectrum noted some bipartisan criticisms of Trump and the settlement. ABC (Lean Left) said, "critics have said the settlement would violate the separation of powers." Forbes (Center) specifically mentioned Senate Majority Leader John Thune's (R) criticisms. And Washington Examiner (Lean Right) noted that the settlement "sidesteps scrutiny from a federal judge" who questioned Trump and the DOJ's relations to the case. The outlet did, however, also note Trump representatives' argument that the scrutiny was a "politically motivated hit job."

What's Next: Forbes said that both the weaponization fund and audit exemption are "so significant that they could lead to the challenging and overturning of this settlement," but suggested an appeal may be unsuccessful due to the conservative Supreme Court majority. The outlet, however, also highlighted that Trump and his financial affiliates are still subject to audits in the future.

Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.