Judge rules Montana law defining sex as only male or female is unconstitutional
LGBTQ Issues,1st Amendment,Gender Identity,Transgender Issues
A judge ruled that a Montana law which defined "sex" in state law, when referring to a person as only male or female, was unconstitutional, saying that the law's description did not explicitly state its purpose.
District Court Judge Shane Vannatta struck down the 2023 law on Tuesday after a group of plaintiffs who identify as transgender, nonbinary, intersex and other identities sued, arguing the law denies legal recognition and protection to people who identify as gender-nonconforming, according to The Associated Press.
Vannatta did not address the claim of a lack of legal recognition and protection, but did say that the bill's title did not adequately explain whether the word "sex" referred to...
Related Coverage
AllSides Picks
Bias
How Did Media Cover Trump's 'Freedom 250' Versus Biden's Pride Celebration on the White House Lawn?
Jessica Carpenter
June 28th, 2026
Red Blue Translator
Cisgender
Red Blue Translator
Gender Identity
More News about LGBTQ Issues
News from the Left
News from the Center
News from the Right
The Daily Signal