Skip to main content

Supreme Court Blocks Biden Administration’s New Eviction Moratorium

Supreme Court,Eviction Moratorium,Housing And Homelessness

From the Center

The Supreme Court on Thursday lifted the latest federal ban on evictions during the Covid-19 pandemic, siding with landlords against a moratorium the Biden administration imposed this month despite questions about its legality. Three liberal justices dissented.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has repeatedly renewed the eviction moratorium for millions of tenants affected by the pandemic, in large part to allow them to remain in their homes as state and local governments struggle to disburse some $47 billion of rental assistance provided by Congress. The current order was set to expire Oct. 3; as of July 31, just $4.7 billion of the rental assistance had reached landlords and tenants.

But in Thursday’s unsigned opinion, the court’s conservative majority said the temporary eviction ban exceeded the CDC’s authority to combat communicable diseases, forcing landlords to bear the pandemic’s costs.

“The moratorium has put…millions of landlords across the country, at risk of irreparable harm by depriving them of rent payments with no guarantee of eventual recovery,” the court said. “Many landlords have modest means. And preventing them from evicting tenants who breach their leases intrudes on one of the most fundamental elements of property ownership—the right to exclude.”

White House press secretary Jen Psaki called the decision disappointing, though President Biden had acknowledged the order was legally shaky.

“As a result of this ruling, families will face the painful impact of evictions, and communities across the country will face greater risk of exposure to Covid-19,” Ms. Psaki said in a statement.

While Congress might hold the power to impose an eviction ban, the court said that the statute invoked by the CDC fell short of providing such authority. The measure, dating from the 1940s, authorizes the surgeon general “to make and enforce such regulations as in his judgment are necessary to prevent the introduction, transmission, or spread of communicable diseases” from abroad or between the states.

AllSides Picks

More News about Housing and Homelessness

News from the Left

News from the Center

News from the Right