"[EPA Administrator] McCarthy also took care to stress that the rule has been changed from the proposed version to clarify that it does not apply to ditches or groundwater, and that agriculture will continue to be exempted. The rule 'does not interfere with private property rights or address land use,' she elaborated. 'It does not regulate any ditches unless they function as tributaries. It does not apply to groundwater or shallow subsurface water, copper tile drains or change policy on irrigation or water transfer.'
'Farmers, ranchers, and foresters are all original conservationists, and we recognize that,' McCarthy said.
Farmers are nonetheless some of the strongest opponents of the rule, along with other business interests New York Times identifies as 'property developers, fertilizer and pesticide makers, oil and gas producers and a national association of golf course owners' — again, polluters that, under the status quo, are getting away with it."
Snippets from the Right
"The rule would clarify which smaller streams, tributaries and wetlands are covered by anti-pollution and development provisions of the Clean Water Act.
But the rules have run into deep opposition from farm groups and the Republican-led Congress. The House voted to block the regulations earlier this month, and a similar effort is underway in the Senate. Critics argue the rules could greatly expand the reach of federal regulators, making every stream, ditch and puddle on farmers' and others' private land subject to federal oversight.
'The administration’s decree to unilaterally expand federal authority is a raw and tyrannical power grab that will crush jobs,' House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said in a written statement following the rules release.
Snippets from the Center