Special Counsel Robert Mueller held a press conference on Wednesday in which he urged Americans to read his report and said it was "not an option" to charge President Trump with a crime under Department of Justice regulations that bar the indictment of a sitting president.
Both sides agree that Mueller's comments were a nod to impeachment: "If we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that," he told the press. Some said that Mueller's comments effectively show that Democrats should begin the impeachment process, while others accused the special counsel of being politically motivated and using a "guilty until proven innocent" standard.
Want to avoid an ALL CAPS screaming match? True argument is not a fight or screaming match. Follow these 5 tips for productive debate and argue skillfully — not angrily.

Snippets from the Center

The Hill
"Mueller, in a dramatic appearance at DOJ headquarters, said it would have been impossible to bring Trump to court and that his final report clearly spelled out that investigators did not conclude that the president was innocent of a crime."
"Congressional Democrats are debating whether to try to move ahead with impeachment in the Democratic-majority U.S. House of Representatives, even though the Republican-controlled Senate would be unlikely to complete the process outlined in the U.S. Constitution for removing a president from office by convicting him."
BBC News
"He detailed 10 instances where Mr Trump had possibly attempted to impede the investigation, but said that charging the president with a crime was not an option for the special counsel."

Snippets from the Left

"Mueller’s remarks alluded to impeachment, saying that the U.S. Constitution 'requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing.' Mueller said his office was 'guided by principles of fairness' and that it 'would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of an actual charge.'"
"Although Mueller believed he was barred from indicting Trump, he said his office was aware that it should act while witnesses and documents were still available, and because it was possible that others would be charged. He said that where Trump was concerned, ultimately, 'the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing.'"
"Mr. Mueller could have avoided much confusion and short-circuited the administration’s attempt to manipulate public opinion if he had made his statement weeks ago, in conjunction with the release of a lightly redacted version of his report. Mr. Barr claimed Mr. Mueller told him privately that Justice Department policy on charging a sitting president was not the reason the special counsel declined to accuse Mr. Trump. In fact, Mr. Mueller insisted Wednesday that his report represents his views on the matter; in effect, he refuted Mr. Barr’s narrative."

Snippets from the Right

Wall Street Journal Editorial Board
"Mr. Mueller would have better served the country and his own reputation if he had simply done what he claimed he wants to do and let his report speak for itself. Instead he has weighed in for the Democrats who want to impeach the President, though he doesn’t have to be politically accountable as he skips town. This is the core problem with special counsels who think they answer only to themselves."
Washington Times Editorial Board
"The Mueller investigation made a perfect hash of Democratic wishes and dreams. Democrats were sure Mr. Mueller’s investigation would return a searing indictment that would set forest fires across not only the president’s administration but banish him to unpleasant nether regions, and ignite such public outrage even in Republican and right-leaning precincts that it would lead to a Democratic landslide in 2020 so great that a Republican wouldn’t show his face for years if not decades. Mr. Mueller didn’t come through.”
The Federalist
"There’s no longer any doubt about who Robert Mueller is or why he conducted himself the way he did. As abominable as his press conference was, we should in many ways be thankful that Mueller so willingly displayed for all to see his disdain for basic rules of prosecutorial conduct, his total lack of self-awareness, and his naked desire to stick it to Trump."
Discover more on this topic on AllSides.