Information is power, but knowing how it comes together can put you in full control.

Here’s some insight on how AllSides creates balanced news — specifically, our popular Headline Roundups.

What Are Headline Roundups?

Headline Roundups are one of the staple offerings of our balanced news operation here at AllSides. We show you three headlines side-by-side from the left, center, and right, and include a short summary of the issue. Sometimes, we include three different viewpoints or opinions on a top issue. Other times, we show you three different news reports.

The AllSides Headline Roundup has multiple purposes: to expose you to different perspectives; to help you to appreciate different views; to get you out of your filter bubble; and to teach you how to spot media bias. By comparing coverage across the political spectrum, you can see what information you may have missed or notice how journalists and commentators spin, slant or sensationalize the same story.

So how exactly does AllSides put Headline Roundups together? Who writes them? Why do somes stories get covered and others don’t?

The AllSides news team — made up of a managing editor, a news editor and two daily news specialists who have biases across the political spectrum — curates and writes around 20 roundups each week, including 3-4 per day on weekdays. This small group is politically balanced and has members who identify as being on the left, right and center.

We see these Roundups as an immensely powerful news consumption tool, and put a lot of thought and time into making good use of them. Here’s how that works.

The Process of Making an AllSides Headline Roundup

Every day, the Headline Roundup creation process begins with a basic but essential question: What is the most politically-relevant news today for you, our audience?

We know you have a wide range of interests — politics, media bias, civility, polarization — but we also beieve that what might be the most important information for you to know isn’t always what’s most clickable, viral or “interesting.” 

With that in mind, our daily news team covers a wide range of stories, from big national news to niche perspectives and specific examples of bias or underrepresentation. The goal is to make you more informed, more engaged in the civic process, and more prepared to interpret and interact with viewpoints that differ from your own.

Typically, we reflect the top stories that news outlets are covering, whether it’s a story throughout the political media or only in one sector. But sometimes, we’ll select a story that isn’t necessarily a top news item, but is still something we think you should know more about.

Step 1: Choosing the Subject

To choose the subject of a Roundup, we first gauge the day’s events by browsing dozens of news sources from across the spectrum and social media platforms. We seek to reflect the top news of the day based on how media on all sides of the spectrum are covering it.

We evaluate how much (or how little) different subjects have been covered across the media; what’s polarizing people that day; if there are split narratives about any subjects; and how relevant the subjects are to you, our audience. Either the subject is something you probably already know about and could use more info on … OR it’s something you maybe haven’t seen, but probably should.

There are plenty of stories we don’t cover with Roundups. Our bandwidth is limited, which holds us to a fixed amount of Roundups per day. Many stories probably warrant this sort of comparison, but we simply can’t get to all of them. 

If we choose to cover something with a Roundup, it means either it was strongly covered by the news media, or it’s a politically-relevant subject that we think you need to know more about.

While we provide balanced news, we believe everyone is biased — including us. It is important to be transparent about bias, so we spell out some of our focus in our Editorial Philosophy. We typically focus or shine light on:

  • political news;
  • voices often ignored;
  • news with contrasting coverage;
  • news with mutual support or common themes across divides;
  • stories on polarization and media bias; 
  • free speech and civil discourse.

Sometimes we cover something that’s big news in one specific “news orbit,” but not big in others. Though it might not be big news everywhere, we’ll still cover it to make sure you get the full picture and round out your understanding of the issue at hand. 

Step 2: Picking the Three Stories

After we settle on a subject, we track down three articles about it, typically from three different points on the political bias spectrum (sometimes, one side will be ignoring the issue or not giving it prominent coverage, while it is a huge story on the other side of the aisle). We try to use different sources for this each day. If a source is known for focusing on whatever subject we’re seeking to cover, we’ll likely look to that source first.

With these three articles, we seek to accurately represent how opposite sides of the media are discussing or framing a subject while also highlighting interesting, polarizing or underrepresented points of view.

If only one source or voice out of many is advancing a certain narrative, we might make note of it, but we’ll avoid representing an entire side of the media with a single outlier.

Sometimes the three articles we choose are all news reports. Sometimes, all three are analysis pieces or op-eds. We try not to cross-compare these — news is compared to other news, and opinions are compared to other opinions. We might want to show how different sides of the news media are covering a particular subject… OR we might want to show how different sides of the political aisle are thinking about and/or acting on it. The Roundup is useful in both situations.

There are times when a story hasn’t been covered at all by one side of the media, but is being covered a lot by another side. In this case, we’ll sometimes publish a “lopsided” Headline Roundup that only features articles from one or two sides of the media instead of one article each from left, right and center. When this happens, we’ll describe the coverage disparity and will strive to make updates if more coverage comes out. 

Step 3: Writing the Summary

Once we’ve found the subject and evaluated the coverage of it, we write our brief summary. 

This is only meant to give the essential facts — what’s going on, who’s involved, and where the news media, talking heads and public figures seem to fall on it. We typically explain any divisions in news coverage, or prominent/misleading/overwhelming narratives about the subject. 

If the story is centered around a piece of controversial content — a Senate bill, a video of the president, audio of a police interaction —  we’ll link to the primary source material in the summary, so you can evaluate the original content for yourself. We also typically try to explain any divisions in news coverage or misleading narratives about the subject.

If we make a mistake in the summary, we’ll go back and change it. If it’s a factual error or misleading piece of information, we’ll affix an Editor’s Note explaining what happened.

Balanced News is the Priority

There’s only so much our small team can do, and we’re far from experts on everything. We typically aren’t fact-checking stories or telling you who is right or wrong. Our goal is to provide you an easy way to get a breadth of information, so you can decide for yourself.

Our Headline Roundups can act as your total daily news consumption, or as a starting point to go much deeper on an issue on your own. This small dose of journalism and curation we do each day is intended to give you just enough information without overwhelming you or adding stress. Plus, studies show that engaging with different perspectives through the news can actually help to lower anxiety about politics and polarization.

If you ever have feedback on a Headline Roundup, reach out to us on social media or email feedback@allsides.com. Thanks for reading!

Henry A. Brechter is the managing editor of AllSides. He has a Center bias.