The Twitter Files: Proof of Censorial Partisanship or Deceptively Overstated?
Summary from AllSides News Team
Evidence recently shared as part of the “Twitter Files” shows how Twitter employees restricted the visibility of some conservative commentators, and held nebulous meetings with the federal government about content moderation. Is this proof of bias at Twitter, or are the potential wrongs being exaggerated?
For Context: Since assuming ownership of Twitter, Elon Musk has recruited independent journalists to comb through and publish previously private decisions and discussions between Twitter employees regarding company protocols and limiting the reach of certain accounts. Musk says these are efforts to increase transparency at Twitter.
Deceivingly Overstated?: Major left-leaning news outlets have spent very little time covering the content of the releases, which suggests that they don’t view them as newsworthy. An article by The Atlantic (Left bias) highlighted the lack of context surrounding the conversations released, and describes Elon Musk as “trolling” and “whipping up a crowd that’s eager to cry censorship and shadowbanning”.
Proof of Partisanship?: Many right-rated voices say the Twitter files confirm suspicions that strong partisan bias at Twitter fueled unjust suppression. A writer for The American Conservative (Right bias) called for "real investigations and hearings about election interference and government instigated censorship."
In the Middle: In reaction to the Twitter Files, one Vox (Left bias) writer concluded that "some reflection may be called for about what constitutes misinformation and what constitutes opinions people may have about policy in a free society."
Featured Coverage of this Story
From the LeftWhy the ‘Twitter Files’ Are Falling Flat
The public has recently gotten an inside peek at the workings of Twitter and Facebook, thanks to a pair of extraordinary document drops.
The first release — the “Facebook Files” — came in late 2021 from Frances Haugen, a former Facebook employee. The second — the “Twitter Files” — came this month from Elon Musk, Twitter’s new owner. Unfortunately for Musk, the “Twitter Files” are not having nearly the same impact as the “Facebook Files” did. And for good reason.
The two document drops are set apart by the methods...
From the CenterTwitter Files: Here’s what they’ve revealed
Five installments of the “Twitter Files” have been shared so far. The initiative, backed by new Twitter CEO Elon Musk, aims to shed light on “free speech suppression” and content moderation measures.
In the video above, NewsNation host Dan Abrams breaks down each of the “Twitter Files” releases and what he says they mean.
“Twitter Files” Part One:
“Twitter Files” part one, released by independent journalist Matt Taibbi, focused on the social media platform’s decision in 2020 to limit the spread of a story from the New York Post about...
From the Right'Twitter Files' have exposed the unholy alliance between Democrats, the FBI, Big Tech, and the media
The "Twitter Files" revealed that an unholy alliance between the Democratic Party, the FBI , Big Tech, and the legacy media worked together to interfere in the 2020 presidential election. These powerful entities abused their power to achieve a common goal: the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story. The revelations about Twitter’s inside dealings expose a concerted effort to manipulate the free flow of information to voters ahead of a critical election.
This was not their first rodeo. In 2016, this corrupt group collaborated to frame former President Donald Trump as...