Who is Stacey Abrams?

The 46-year old Georgia politician, who in 2018 became the country’s first female major-party African-American gubernatorial nominee, is one of the names being discussed prominently as Joe Biden’s potential 2020 running mate. But how you answer that first question may depend largely on your news preferences or political biases.

If you only read left-leaning news media, you may think Abrams is destined for influence in American politics, and symbolic of the new wave of progressive policy and diverse leadership. If you only read right-rated media, you may think Abrams is unqualified for the office, a hypocrite, too radical, or a token of the political left.

Get AllSides in your Inbox

Get balanced news in your inbox weekly.

In recent weeks, Abrams has been the subject of several longform profiles, feature stories and opinion pieces from left-rated media giants including the New York Times, the Washington Post and The Atlantic, many of which suggest she’s a solid choice for VP. Here’s a few of those headlines:


Stacey Abrams’s Remarkable Campaign for Vice President (The Atlantic)

The Power of Stacey Abrams (Washington Post)


Stacey Abrams Wants More Than the Vice Presidency (New York Times)

Biden has four great options for a black female running mate. One is his best. (Washington Post)


Left-leaning media’s celebrations of Abrams’ character and bolstering of her political status have been evenly matched by a slew of negative coverage and columns from the powers of the media spectrum’s right side.

The New York Post and the Washington Examiner published opinion pieces critiquing Abrams’ credentials. Fox News and others have circulated coverage that paints Abrams as disillusioned or hypocritical, particularly in relation to how she reacted to Tara Reade’s sexual assault allegations against Biden. Here’s some examples of those headlines:


Stacey Abrams's embarrassing campaign for the vice presidency (Washington Examiner)

Stacey Abrams: We Should Believe Women But… (Townhall)


Stacey Abrams denies applying double standard to Biden and Kavanaugh allegations (Fox News)

Stacey Abrams would be the most preposterous vice presidential pick ever (Rich Lowry)


Voices on either side have even criticized each other over Abrams’ candidacy. Some left-rated voices allege blatant racism on the part of Abrams’ detractors; some right-rated outlets accused left-leaning media of exaggerating Abrams’ status.


Gosh, what could be behind the right’s hatred of Stacey Abrams? (Jennifer Rubin)

Washington Post Roundly Mocked For ‘Bizarre’ Stacey Abrams Profile Comparing Her To ‘A Runway Supermodel’ (The Daily Caller)


Such buzz around a relatively new and intriguing face in politics is not uncommon. It’s also probably not accidental.

It’s typical for political interest groups and advocates who favor a candidate for elected office to work press contacts in an attempt to drum up positive coverage of that candidate. Meanwhile, groups who may oppose the candidate are likely to work in the opposite direction, mobilizing dissenting voices to create a media backlash against the campaign.

As Biden’s running mate, Abrams would in many ways be comparable to former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, the 2008 Republican running partner of late Sen. John McCain. Abrams’ political resume is limited when compared to those of previous vice presidents; she’s paired with an elderly presidential candidate; and her gender would give her a chance to revolutionize the executive branch.

Palin, like Abrams, was glorified in some corners and heavily scrutinized in others. Ultimately, Palin didn't pan out as an adequate VP pick — McCain later said he regretted choosing her. It remains to be seen whether Abrams will be Biden’s choice, or what her future in American politics holds. But don’t let the media decide how you view her as a candidate.

Someone who may have expected to hate Abrams could actually come to support her, and of course vice versa. But those sorts of breakthroughs are impossible when confined to a filter bubble and lost in a sea of bias-confirming content. This is why AllSides exists: to help you get balanced news and diverse perspectives, to read across the aisle so you can get a sense of what is being highlighted or omitted. Instead of letting partisan media decide for you, you can think for yourself.

This piece was written by Henry A. Brechter, Managing Editor (Center bias), and was reviewed, expanded upon and edited by John Gable, CEO and Co-Founder (Lean Right bias), Samantha Shireman, Information Architect (Lean Left bias), Julie Mastrine, Director of Marketing (Lean Right bias) and Hirsh Joshi, news curator (Left bias).

Photo: TED Conference/Flickr