Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Biden Admin's Deportation Policies
Summary from the AllSides News Team
The Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday in challenges brought by Texas and Louisiana against the Biden Administration's deportation policies.
For Context: After two hours of oral arguments, it wasn't clear how the court might rule on the case, with the six conservatives justices appearing indecisive. In September 2021, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced that it would focus on deporting people deemed risks to national security, public safety, and border security. Officials from Texas and Louisiana, along with others, said those priorities contradict federal laws requiring deportations of other unauthorized immigrants who might not fit that specific criteria. A U.S. district judge agreed and vacated the new policies in June, and the Supreme Court upheld that ruling but agreed to hear arguments in the case.
Key Quotes: Liberal Justice Elena Kagan argued that conservative-controlled courts stopped "a federal immigration policy in its tracks." Conservative Justice Samuel Alito accused the U.S. solicitor general, who was arguing for the administration, of advocating for "a rule of special hostility to state standing."
How the Media Covered It: Right-rated media often framed the policies as having encouraged record levels of migrants arriving at the southern border, and some suggested it was a ploy by the Biden Administration to deport fewer people. Left- and center-rated outlets focused more on how the court didn't indicate a clear consensus on the matter during Tuesday's arguments.
Featured Coverage of this Story
From the LeftSupreme Court hears Texas’ challenge to Biden immigration and deportation policies
The Supreme Court on Tuesday questioned the Biden administration’s authority to prioritize which non-citizens to deport when hearing a challenge brought by two Republican state attorneys general who say the Department of Homeland Security is skirting federal immigration law.
The justices were considering three distinct issues in the case, which opens the door to shifting majorities. After arguments, it wasn’t clear if there was a clear majority in any one area.
The case, brought by Texas and Louisiana, is the latest salvo from conservative states who have all but declared war on...
From the CenterU.S. Supreme Court mulls Biden immigration enforcement shift
U.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday struggled over a bid by President Joe Biden's administration to implement guidelines - challenged by two conservative-leaning states - shifting immigration enforcement toward countering public safety threats.
The justices heard about two hours of arguments in the administration's request to overturn a judge's ruling in favor of Texas and Louisiana that halted U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) guidelines narrowing the scope of those who can be targeted by immigration agents for arrest and deportation.
The court's three liberal members generally signaled support for the administration...
From the RightBiden Admin Makes The Case For Deporting Fewer Illegals To The Supreme Court
The Biden administration on Tuesday defended its push to deport fewer illegal immigrants before the Supreme Court.
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas announced in September 2021 new priorities for deportations that limited illegal migrant apprehensions and removals to risks to national security, public safety and border security. Texas and Louisiana sued the Biden administration in April over its policy to limit immigration enforcement, arguing that the federal government is skirting the law with the policy.
During Tuesday’s arguments before the high court, the Biden administration argued that states lack the right to sue the...