https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/10/08/strange-sudden-bipartisan-avoidance-roe-v-wade/
Save stories to read later or create you own news web site to share with anyone
Notify me when I can create my custom news board
We will not share your email addressAlready on AllSides? Log In
AllSides members can bookmark any article and read it later. Save this article by becoming a member today!
Join AllSides to read, share and understand all perspectives of today's news and issues.
Learn more »AllSides members can instantly post news stories to their own personal page, making it easy to share and discuss information they care about. Become your own publisher by becoming a member today! Learn about My Front Page.
Join AllSides to read, share and understand all perspectives of today's news and issues.
Learn more »
The nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court could prove pivotal on abortion rights. As was first revealed last week, Barrett in 2006 signed on to a newspaper ad calling for “an end to the barbaric legacy of Roe v. Wade.” And even if a new 6-to-3 conservative majority wouldn’t overturn Roe, it could allow the court to chip away at abortion rights in many other ways — as Barrett has more recently suggested.
But you almost wouldn’t know that by watching last week’s presidential debate and Wednesday...
