https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2019/0604/Medicare-for-all-why-supporters-can-t-agree-what-it-should-mean
Save stories to read later or create you own news web site to share with anyone
Notify me when I can create my custom news board
We will not share your email addressAlready on AllSides? Log In
AllSides members can bookmark any article and read it later. Save this article by becoming a member today!
Join AllSides to read, share and understand all perspectives of today's news and issues.
Learn more »AllSides members can instantly post news stories to their own personal page, making it easy to share and discuss information they care about. Become your own publisher by becoming a member today! Learn about My Front Page.
Join AllSides to read, share and understand all perspectives of today's news and issues.
Learn more »
In 2020, with your help, AllSides will bring you even more tools to strengthen our democracy, including a mobile app, bias ratings for every article, regional news, and more. If you believe diverse perspectives and balanced news are important to our nation, make a gift today. Each and every donation helps us to strengthen our democracy by freeing people from filter bubbles.
American ideas about what universal health coverage should look like aren’t exactly universal. Between the dickering over “single payer” versus “public option” models lies a deeper debate about how Americans value health care.
When the House Rules Committee recently took up a controversial topic – shifting U.S. health care onto the shoulders of government as a “single payer” – the voice of one witness seemed loudest precisely because he had none. Due to illness, activist Ady Barkan was unable to speak to the committee. Instead his typed responses, delivered to...
